
© Sherman Charles
I ran across this list on one of the photoblogs. Thought it would be interesting to fill it out for myself.
————-
color: yes
black & white: yes
film: no, but wouldn’t mind
digital: yes
available light: when available
lit: when called for
heavily lit: no
over lit: not intentional
large format: no, would be sweet though
medium format: no
35mm: yes
holga/junk: no
shoots men: yes
shoots women: strangely mostly
shoots children: no
studio: no
location: yes
portrait: yes
photojournalist: suck at
fashion: no, but would try
beauty: no, but would try
still life: sometimes
fine art: dabbling
advertising: no, but aiming
outdoor: anytime
automotive: no
food: no
interior: no, but aiming for
sports: no
conceptual: no
travel and leisure-e: no but interested
urban: no
gritty: no
nike: no
high production value: no
low production value: yes
slick: no
raw : yes
grainy : no
saturated : no
captured moment: yes, aim for it
americana: no
weird: not really
stark: no
quirky: no
props: no
lyrical: ??
painterly: maybe
high contrast: sometimes, if it fits
naked: semi but working on it
cool: no
off moment: aim for it
awkward: no, but aim for it
muted color: no
crunchy (super sharp): no, don’t like
great casting: no
tight: no
landscape: yes, mainly seascape
action :no
sets: no
real people : prefer
models : rarely, good ones, never
trashy : no
heroin chic : no
vintage :no
gimmicky: no
kitschy: ?
Lord-of-the-Rings-y (overly digitally processed so people look like video game characters): no, don’t like
Platonish: no
natural: yes
fussy: no
unstyled: yes
overstyled: no
spontaneous: yes, aim for
sluggish: no
energetic: yes
vibrant: sometimes
clever: probably not
cinematic : possibly
snapshotty (as opposed to snap-shoddy): no
faux-testino: no
film noir: yes and me like
square: no
street: suck at
bad: sometimes
awful: rarely I hope
lame: no
man hands: think I have slender fingers
can shoot anything: my way
haute-shit : no

